From: Bill Dean
Date: 01 Jul 1999
Time: 13:23:37
Has anyone tackled a situation where the governing body of the acceptance sampling will not leave a "c=0" plan only because "it would look bad" to accept a lot with a known defect.....even when it has been explained that the same protection to the consumer can be achieved with non-zero accept numbers (also larger sample sizes) while adding protection to the consumer? I need a success story!